Re: Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with 'development=true'
Project / Subsystem
binutils / binutils
Date
2026-05-04
Proposer
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Source type
public_inbox
Consensus
Proposed
Sentiment
—/10
All attributes
- project
- binutils
- subsystem
- binutils
- patch_id
- —
- discussion_id
- alpine.DEB.2.21.2605041254140.23161@angie.orcam.me.uk
- source_type
- public_inbox
- title
- Re: Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with 'development=true'
- headline
- Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with 'development=true'
- tldr
- The Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with 'development=true' due to different commits used for the two tarballs.
- proposer
- "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
- consensus
- Proposed
- outcome
- proposed
- sentiment_score
- —
- technical_tradeoffs
- []
- series_id
- —
- series_role
- standalone
- series_parts
- []
- tags
- []
- bugzilla_url
- —
- date
- 2026-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Re: Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with 'development=true'
The Binutils 2.46 tarball was packaged with ‘development=true’ because the two tarballs were created from slightly different commits. The author questions whether the release packaging script should pick the release tag automagically.