Re: [02/19] RISC-V: fold redundant code in riscv_ip()

Project / Subsystem

binutils / risc-v

Date

2026-05-09

Proposer

Jiawei <jiawei@iscas.ac.cn>

Source type

public_inbox

Consensus

Under Review

Sentiment

/10

Technical tradeoffs

  • Improved code readability and maintainability.
  • Potential for subtle changes in behavior due to refactoring, requiring careful testing.

All attributes

project
binutils
subsystem
risc-v
patch_id
discussion_id
e2f901c6-4690-4381-bd31-377113feb8b3@iscas.ac.cn
source_type
public_inbox
title
Re: [02/19] RISC-V: fold redundant code in riscv_ip()
headline
RISC-V: fold redundant code in riscv_ip()
tldr
Jiawei agrees with Jan Beulich's suggestion to rename O4 in a preparatory patch before cleaning up riscv_ip().
proposer
Jiawei <jiawei@iscas.ac.cn>
consensus
Under Review
outcome
proposed
sentiment_score
technical_tradeoffs
  • Improved code readability and maintainability.
  • Potential for subtle changes in behavior due to refactoring, requiring careful testing.
series_id
series_role
reply
series_parts
[]
tags
  • binutils
  • risc-v
  • refactoring
  • assembler
  • disassembler
bugzilla_url
date
2026-05-09T00:00:00.000Z

Re: [02/19] RISC-V: fold redundant code in riscv_ip()

Jiawei agrees with Jan Beulich’s suggestion to address the misleading name ‘O4’ in the RISC-V instruction parsing code (riscv_ip()) with a preparatory patch before proceeding with the main cleanup patch. This approach aims to make the cleanup process cleaner by avoiding a temporary special case related to the ‘O4’ misnomer.