Re: git branches
Project / Subsystem
binutils / binutils
Date
2026-05-14
Proposer
Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
Source type
public_inbox
Consensus
Proposed
Sentiment
—/10
Technical tradeoffs
- • Cleanup of remote git repository at the cost of developer time.
All attributes
- project
- binutils
- subsystem
- binutils
- patch_id
- —
- discussion_id
- 87h5oaicyo.fsf@esperi.org.uk
- source_type
- public_inbox
- title
- Re: git branches
- headline
- git branches
- tldr
- Author confirms deletion of a mistakenly pushed branch and clarifies its purpose.
- proposer
- Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
- consensus
- Proposed
- outcome
- proposed
- sentiment_score
- —
- technical_tradeoffs
-
- • Cleanup of remote git repository at the cost of developer time.
- series_id
- —
- series_role
- standalone
- series_parts
- []
- tags
-
- • git
- • branch
- • repository
- • development
- • workflow
- bugzilla_url
- —
- date
- 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z
Re: git branches
In response to a request, the author confirms deletion of a mistakenly pushed git branch. The author clarifies that the branch was intended for public but pre-upstream development of CTFv4. A local push script adjustment has been made to prevent similar errors.