Re: Starting patch review wiki

Project / Subsystem

gcc / gcc

Date

2026-05-24

Proposer

Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Source type

public_inbox

Consensus

Proposed

Sentiment

/10

Technical tradeoffs

  • Suggests using tools that may have false positives, requiring developers to understand and ignore irrelevant warnings.
  • Adds an extra step to the development process, which may slow down contributions if the tools are cumbersome to use.

All attributes

project
gcc
subsystem
gcc
patch_id
discussion_id
CALvbMcBPnQzpmkhA+Cc34grLxvFbhhEwnhpdFfuyfYZHt6oy3A@mail.gmail.com
source_type
public_inbox
title
Re: Starting patch review wiki
headline
Starting patch review wiki
tldr
Andrew Pinski added recommendations to the patch review wiki for new developers to use tools for commit message and coding style correctness.
proposer
Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
consensus
Proposed
outcome
proposed
sentiment_score
technical_tradeoffs
  • Suggests using tools that may have false positives, requiring developers to understand and ignore irrelevant warnings.
  • Adds an extra step to the development process, which may slow down contributions if the tools are cumbersome to use.
series_id
series_role
standalone
series_parts
[]
tags
  • patch review
  • coding style
  • commit message
  • wiki
bugzilla_url
date
2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

Re: Starting patch review wiki

Andrew Pinski added recommendations to the patch review wiki for new developers. These recommendations suggest using tools to ensure commit messages and coding styles are correct, especially for email patch reviews. The wiki also notes that ./contrib/check_GNU_style.py needs improvements, since it flags errors incorrectly in some cases.