Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] bfd/RISC-V: Zvfbfwma implies Zvfbfmin
Project / Subsystem
binutils / bfd/risc-v
Date
2026-07-21
Proposer
Nelson Chu <nelson.chu1990@gmail.com>
Source type
public_inbox
Consensus
Proposed
Sentiment
—/10
Technical tradeoffs
- • Ensures specification compliance at the cost of a minor change in established logic.
All attributes
- project
- binutils
- subsystem
- bfd/risc-v
- patch_id
- —
- discussion_id
- CAHT-pJzSFKGzjFEqypAcAp1YnWMkq6LvGLX+879VxqBQDy8sKA@mail.gmail.com
- source_type
- public_inbox
- title
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] bfd/RISC-V: Zvfbfwma implies Zvfbfmin
- headline
- RISC-V: Zvfbfwma implies Zvfbfmin
- tldr
- Confirmation and acceptance of a patch clarifying RISC-V extension implications in binutils.
- proposer
- Nelson Chu <nelson.chu1990@gmail.com>
- consensus
- Proposed
- outcome
- proposed
- sentiment_score
- —
- technical_tradeoffs
-
- • Ensures specification compliance at the cost of a minor change in established logic.
- series_id
- binutils:bfd/risc-v: zvfbfwma implies zvfbfmin
- series_role
- reply
- series_parts
- []
- tags
-
- • risc-v
- • extensions
- • binutils
- • specification
- • patch
- bugzilla_url
- —
- date
- 2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] bfd/RISC-V: Zvfbfwma implies Zvfbfmin
Nelson Chu confirms and accepts a patch related to RISC-V extension implications within binutils. The patch corrects an assumption about which extension implies another, specifically concerning Zvfbfwma and Zvfbfmin. The discussion also touches upon the explicit nature of the RISC-V specification regarding these implications.