Re: RFC: Should -fplugin and -fplugin-arg options be excluded from DW_AT_producer recording?
Project / Subsystem
gcc / gcc
Date
2026-08-14
Proposer
Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Source type
public_inbox
Consensus
Proposed
Sentiment
—/10
Technical tradeoffs
- • Improved build reproducibility vs. potentially losing detailed plugin invocation information in debug data.
All attributes
- project
- gcc
- subsystem
- gcc
- patch_id
- —
- discussion_id
- CAFiYyc03wuxRL=CuTr7jSNkMjWiqKaBLikdcjGfKzP2=nvQiCA@mail.gmail.com
- source_type
- public_inbox
- title
- Re: RFC: Should -fplugin and -fplugin-arg options be excluded from DW_AT_producer recording?
- headline
- Exclude -fplugin and -fplugin-arg from DW_AT_producer recording
- tldr
- RFC to prevent absolute plugin paths and arguments from being embedded in DWARF debug info, improving build reproducibility.
- proposer
- Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
- consensus
- Proposed
- outcome
- proposed
- sentiment_score
- —
- technical_tradeoffs
-
- • Improved build reproducibility vs. potentially losing detailed plugin invocation information in debug data.
- series_id
- —
- series_role
- standalone
- series_parts
- []
- tags
-
- • dwarf
- • debug info
- • reproducibility
- • compiler
- • gcc
- url
- https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAFiYyc03wuxRL=CuTr7jSNkMjWiqKaBLikdcjGfKzP2=nvQiCA@mail.gmail.com
- bugzilla_url
- —
- date
- 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z
Re: RFC: Should -fplugin and -fplugin-arg options be excluded from DW_AT_producer recording?
This RFC proposes excluding GCC plugin-related options (-fplugin=