Re: gitweb broken?

Project / Subsystem

gcc / gcc

Date

2026-08-16

Proposer

Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

Source type

public_inbox

Consensus

Proposed

Sentiment

—/10

Technical tradeoffs

  • • Lowering proof-of-work difficulty may reduce effectiveness against sophisticated botnets.
  • • Switching challenge types (meta-refresh to JavaScript) might affect users with older browsers or specific accessibility needs.

All attributes

project
gcc
subsystem
gcc
patch_id
—
discussion_id
20260816212922.GA4558@gnu.wildebeest.org
source_type
public_inbox
title
Re: gitweb broken?
headline
gitweb broken?
tldr
Sourceware has lowered the difficulty for its Anubis proof-of-work system to address performance issues and slow commit browsing.
proposer
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
consensus
Proposed
outcome
proposed
sentiment_score
—
technical_tradeoffs
  • • Lowering proof-of-work difficulty may reduce effectiveness against sophisticated botnets.
  • • Switching challenge types (meta-refresh to JavaScript) might affect users with older browsers or specific accessibility needs.
series_id
—
series_role
standalone
series_parts
[]
tags
  • • performance
  • • infrastructure
  • • security
  • • DoS
bugzilla_url
—
date
2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

Re: gitweb broken?

Mark Wielaard reports that Sourceware has reduced the difficulty of the Anubis proof-of-work system from 5 to 4, aiming to improve performance for users experiencing slow commit browsing. They also switched the wiki and Bugzilla from meta-refresh to JavaScript challenges to combat scraper attacks.